F.U.N.N.Y, which spells Fun NY.

Nicely observed comment.

Patrick - The inevitable consequence. My brother, who difuses controversial questions with humor, would like to see marriage redefined...as one man and multiple women. ;D

OMR. The Supreme Court ruled against multiple marriage in the 19th century, primarily as an attack on the controversial Latter Day Saints. Polygamy has been accepted in many cultures for millenia. The idea of calling same-sex unions "marriage" is, to my understanding, very recent. If same-sex unions are accepted under the law, then I really can't see any logical or constitutional barrier to multiple partner marriage, homo, hetero or mixed. Mormon sects which never accepted the Church's change in doctrine still practice polygamy in isolated areas, mostly undisturbed. Amongst the growing Muslim population, this has to exist, out of sight of authorities, who would be reluctant to prosecute for fear of being labeled "racist". Same sex marriage is just unpopular enough among a broad segment of the population that the Courts will find it irresistible to impose its legal acceptance by judicial fiat. Polygamy will follow simply from fear of being branded as discriminatory. And it will be the result of Islam, not Mormonism. Store this prediction away and dig it up in five or ten years.